hnnhmcgrth:

Timothy Moore - Oroma Elewa, Brooklyn, June 2013

(Source: wordsneedspace, via happiness-etc)

randompandemonium:

soprie:

actionables:

hmm, yoga is kind of girly #nohomo
let’s rename it so it sounds manlier and make it just for the bros
for the bros only

WHY DO MEN NEED TO REBRAND EVERYTHING TOUCHED BY WOMEN?

SIT DOWN AND EAT YOUR YOGURT AND SALAD AND DO YOUR YOGA

FOLLOW UP YOUR INTENSE BROGA SESSION WITH SOME BROGURT AND A BRAH-LAD

(via gallifreyan-gallimaufry)

queerfuls:

i’m gonna start a Cute Bi Club for all bisexual and biromantic folks and all we’re gonna do is pet cats and talk about how cute and bi we are 

When and where would we meet?

(via bisexual-community)

Posted 10 hours ago (originally queerfuls) + 1,693 notes

adhemarpo:

He Jiaying, peintre chinois contemporain

(via racialicious)

Posted 10 hours ago (originally adhemarpo) + 40,188 notes

betype:

Penguin Drop Caps Series by Jessica Hische and Paul Buckley.

Jessica Hische and Paul Buckley have collaborated on an exciting new project, a series of cover designs for classic literature featuring Jessica’s Drop Caps. The first six titles, below, look pretty amazing.

Check you favorite one here: http://amzn.to/KcgDnT

Posted 13 hours ago (originally betype) + 460 notes

(Source: brooklynmutt, via hipster-rawry)

desjardins:

moresongsaboutbuildings:

Gillian Anderson as Morticia Addams. You’re welcome.

hnnngghhhh

(via operafloozy)

design-is-fine:

Willi Kriegel, Morning, Noon, Evening and Night, 1943. Oil on Hardboard. Germany. Via Schmidt Auktionen

'La fille en plâtre' in Dior Couture 2007 (2009) Photography by Cathleen Naundorf.

(Source: anothermag.com)

The Pornographication of Fitness Needs to Stop

the-exercist:

cardio-and-calculus:

the-exercist:

complexmindsimpleheart:

the-exercist:

Fitness magazines don’t help us get fit. Gazing at images of caricatured breasts, buttocks and biceps gives you the impression this is how a fit body should look, that every fit body needs to be shaped in the same vein. Fitness magazines use exactly these images to “inspire” women to look this way. Yet most of us can’t identify with what we are looking at because we don’t believe ordinary us could ever be them. 

[…] What are we teaching our young women who want desperately to believe that they too can be as ripped and shredded? They don’t realize what it takes to look so tight. They want to be there and harm themselves to reach an almost unattainable ideal. When will it be acceptable to lift heavy, building confidence and brainpower while strengthening your body, not concerning yourself with how cute your bottom looks in booty shorts?

[…] Being fit in a functional rather than sexual way means you are entirely capable of being powerful no matter what your height, bust size, shoe size or hair color. You are empowered from the depths of your DNA because you did the work, you earned your place and you walk confidently because of it. A functionally fit You welcomes all sizes, shapes and colors, your boobs and butt are incidental. What we really need to build in the gym is a sense of self and what we are capable of.

!!! But add boys/men

No.

We’re talking about women right now. 

Or we can talk about everybody because there’s an unrealistic expectation for men as well as women

A word to everyone who reblogs posts with responses like the above:

If you actually cared about men’s issues, you wouldn’t tack them on as an afterthought to a woman’s conversation: You’d instead be actively engaging in dialogues that explore the nuances of men’s problems in society. You wouldn’t simply wait until a woman is speaking and then shout “Yeah, men too!” You’d talk about these things independently and give men the attention that they deserve as individuals, instead of waiting for a woman to do the work, shouldering her aside and then insisting that men be given a spot on the stage too. 

If you actually cared about women’s issues, you wouldn’t demand that they give up their space. You’d recognize that conversations by women and about women are perfectly valid. When a woman is talking about her personal experiences and the way social pressures have affected her life, you wouldn’t allow her to be interrupted or derailed. You wouldn’t actively talk over her or steal away attention, focusing on issues that are outside of her point, until the conversation drifts so far away that you aren’t even discussing women anymore. 

So both now and in the future, my answer here is going to remain the same: Can we talk about everyone?

No.

We’re still talking about women right now. 

(via teacupnosaucer)

Posted 1 day ago (originally the-exercist) + 7,073 notes

(Source: openbookstore, via bisexualskies)

stfumadison:

Rose McGowan

(Source: retrogirly, via thisfemaleform)

Posted 1 day ago (originally retrogirly) + 2,620 notes